Book reviews, new books, publishing news, book giveaways, and author interviews

Review: Lord of Darkness by Elizabeth Hoyt

Lord of Darkness by Elizabeth Hoyt Review: Lord of Darkness by Elizabeth Hoyt

Whew, here I am, having emerged from air after slogging my way through Elizabeth Hoyts'Lord of Darkness, the latest in her Maiden Lane series. Though not a long novel, Lord of Darkness certainly feels it: I suspect that there might be some sort of time dilation powers hidden within its pages.

Theres a reason that category romance novels tend to fall in at just under two hundred or so pages, and thats that its terribly difficult to sustain a plot thats entirely predicated on the romantic back-and-forth between two people beyond that. Category authors work within some stringent word length constraints to be able to give us a story arc thats believable, and to flesh out their main and secondary characters as well, and the more I read within the romance genre, the more I appreciate the skill involved in doing this well.

Though Ive read a handful of shorter historical romances, Hoyts'Lord of Darkness is my first foray into the heftier works in this genre, and I have to say that Ive come away feeling a little dizzy and not entirely enlightened. In part I suspect that this is because Ive come in mid-way through a series, and that the novel leans heavily on previous the preceding volumes. But my ambivalence has a lot to do with the fact that overall this is a sadly uneven bookwhich makes it feel much, much longer than it actually is.

The novel largely involves the development of the relationship between'hero Godric, widower nobleman by day and ye olde time vigilante Ghost of St Giles by night, and Megs, with whom Godric entered into a marriage of convenience two years prior in order to stave off gossip about Megss pregnancyto a man who had been recently killed. The two have lived entirely separate lives since then, each mourning their respective partners, and in Megss case, the loss of her baby. But now Megs is back in Godrics life, and shes determined to have a baby. Of course, doing so will involve consummating the marriage and coming to terms with the losses of their loved ones.

So much of a romance novel is about the relationship between the two main characters and the readers connection with them. Unfortunately, I never really connected with Godrics character, nor with that of Megs, and by the end of the novel I felt like one of the many long-suffering guests forced to board at their home: I wanted nothing more than to escape their frustrating bickering and the infuriating repetition of their interactions. Obviously as the two are already married, we need something to keep them apart, which here is Godrics love for his deceased wife and Megss love/guilt surrounding her lover. But the way that these issues are overcome feels abrupt and at odds with the set-up that theyre given: we go from chastity and mourning to endless (and not in a good way) sex scenes.

In addition to the romance between Godric and Megs, theres all sorts of other stuff going on, much of it between characters who I imagine must have played significant roles in previous books, because there are plot threads here that seem to be ongoingsuch as that of Artemis, a point of view character who slips in and out of the narrative for a reason I couldnt fathom without having read the prior books in the series. The society scenes are hard to parse without this background knowledge, and the Ghost of St Giles business is a bit of a messthe plot conceits to get both Godric and Megs in the same place and to eventually reveal Godrics secret identity feel contrived; the Secret Garden allusion with Megss dead tree in the garden felt forced as well.'Oddly enough, the high point of the novel has nothing to do with the main characters and their arcs, but is rather grumpy old Aunt Elvina and her pet pug Her Grace, both of whom snuffle and snort around and get up to all sorts of mischief.

With'Lord of Darkness I found myself alternating between floundering through scenes where I felt like a gatecrasher at a party and between feeling as though I was forcing myself through a viscous vat of verbiage. Though Im sure having read the previous books in this series would have helped me get a better handle on this one, Im not sure I want to commit to reading four other books that might well suffer from the same issues as this one.

Rating: star Review: Lord of Darkness by Elizabeth Hoytstar Review: Lord of Darkness by Elizabeth Hoytblankstar Review: Lord of Darkness by Elizabeth Hoytblankstar Review: Lord of Darkness by Elizabeth Hoytblankstar Review: Lord of Darkness by Elizabeth Hoyt (okay)

With thanks to Grand Central Publishing (via Netgalley) for the review copy

Support Read in a Single Sitting by purchasing'Lord of Darkness'using one of the affiliate links below:

Amazon'|'Book Depository UK'|'Book Depository USA'|'Booktopia

or support your'local independent.

Other books by Elizabeth Hoyt:

The Serpent Prince by Elizabeth Hoyt Review: Lord of Darkness by Elizabeth Hoyt Thief of Shadows by Elizabeth Hoyt Review: Lord of Darkness by Elizabeth Hoyt The Raven Prince by Elizabeth Hoyt Review: Lord of Darkness by Elizabeth Hoyt



  1. I am a bit of an Elizabeth Hoyt fangirl but I still would not have started this particular series at this point! I like that her books have more depth than some others. I havent read this one yet, so it will be interesting to see how it stands up to the other books in the series. I must confess I read the sneak peak for this book and kind of went huh? so maybe this one will be a harder one for me to read too.

    • I didnt realise when I signed up for the blog tour how established the series was, and that the books didnt stand alone at all. Oh well! I have another of hers, but I might just donate it to a good cause. :)

  2. Martha Morrison /


    I used to be a fan of Elizabeth Hoyts (not an uncritical one), but after this book she lost me. I thought it was shockingly bad and completely anachronistic (the heroine and the gendere relations distinctly and intrusively 21st century). Could not care about the main couple at all. Since they spent the greater part of the book remembering their dead loves, any declaration of love was bound to come too late and, in the end, rung utterly false (and forced). I also find the ghost of St. Giles conceit silly and it is time Hoyt ditched it. A big big disappointment.

    • Thanks for visiting, Martha! Im sorry to hear that this one didnt work for you, either. I do feel for romance authors who are trying to be historically accurate while still writing female characters who have agency (and heroes who arent controlling chauvinists!). It must be a very difficult line to walk. That aside, though, I was surprised by how very long this one was. It seemed to stretch on for ever!