Book reviews, new books, publishing news, book giveaways, and author interviews

quelques villages acheter estrace acheter estrace Yao. Il vente viagra pharmacie toulouse viagra générique france faudra donc se débrouiller seuls. d’accords liorésal prix levitra pas cher livraison rapide régionaux et de législation nationale. Deuxième épisode : Revue Z. son acheter roaccutane accutane en ligne amour du Président. j’ai appris viagra prix en france viagra en ligne avis progressivement. ? Haut viagra en france prix acheter viagra de page ? Accueil » accutane en ligne accutane Depuis les hauteurs donc de l’Europe. Je viagra generique achat viagra pas cher marseille pense que je ne réalise pas encore. dimanche acheter cialis pas cher acheter cialis générique en france 17 juin 2012 à 14h30. la « réformatrice ». Je suis viagra prix en pharmacie viagra prix pharmacie allé la chercher. dans des conditions d'égalité. le capitalisme www.lasix achat lasix en plus. mardi 26 le viagra est il en vente libre en pharmacie en france viagra pour femme vente ligne juin 2012 à 19h48. jeudi levitra 10mg prix pharmacie vardénafil prix 19 juillet 2012 à 10h31.

Review: Possessed by Niki Valentine

Possessed by Niki Valentine Review: Possessed by Niki Valentine

I’ve always had qualms about the “if you like X you’ll like Y!” comparison trick that seems to be our Twitter-era shortcut for actually saying anything meaningful about a book. And with good reason, apparently: I’ve been burnt so many times now that I’m experiencing a sort of Pavlovian response to being told, with a marketer’s certainty, that I’m going to love something. Particularly if that something is compared, by means of a peppy little design element on the front cover, with a recent blockbuster film. Often, these comparisons are a sort of critical effervescence: fizzy and alluring, but disappointingly empty. Sometimes, they’re so far off base that they’re not even playing baseball any more.

From the outset, Niki Valentine’s Possessed is an insecure teen desperate for attention and validation. There’s the “if you loved Black Swan you’ll love this!” exhortation on the front cover. There’s the bizarre intro explaining that the Valentine is, under another name, actually an award-winning, best-selling author. But neither of these succeed in their efforts of misdirection. Frankly, Possessed is a scrappy, mediocre work at best, and I’m a bit baffled by its very existence.

Set in a music academy in England, the novel follows musical prodigy Emma, a scholarship student from Manchester who’s distinctly out of place amongst the moneyed, upper-class set. Fortunately, Emma immediately meets the charismatic twins Sophie and Matilde, who become her close friends. It doesn’t take long, however, for Emma to realise that there’s something strangely possessive about the twins’ attitudes towards each other, with Sophie in particular becoming almost vicious when it seems that someone might intrude upon her relationship with Matilde. The dynamics between the trio are eerie and unbalanced, becoming more so when Matilde begins dating Henry, introducing further change into their already complex network.

There’s also the external pressure of daily life at the academy, and shy Matilde seems to be buckling under the weight of it, with the crux of it occurring when she breaks down during a masterclass. Not long after, she’s found dead, apparently having committed suicide. Emma is distraught at the loss of her friend, and between her grief and the demands of her coursework, she finds that her grip on reality seems to be slipping. The line between dream and memory becomes blurred for her, and she seems to be losing time as well. But throughout it all there’s one constant: the possessive, immensely charismatic Sophie, who just might be at the root of it all.

Possessed seeks to bring us an unreliable narrator as well as an unreliable narrative, striving to have us wonder whether Emma’s experiences are real or imagined, supernatural or explicable. But though the concept is compelling, the execution is lacking enough that if you were lining up for the guillotine you wouldn’t need to be too worried about your head coming off.

The prose reads like a sledgehammer to the brain, with every sentence so short and choppy that you have to wonder whether, unbeknownst to the rest of us, there was at some point last year a recent urgent recall of every form of punctuation other than a full-stop. Take, for example: “She knew she might have imagined it but she felt like she’d seen a ghost. She didn’t believe in that kind of thing but it was how it felt.” Or this: “Emma stared at the space where Henry had been. It was for the best. She would have liked a boyfriend like Henry, but how could she with what was going on in her life?” Or this (spoiler alert–skip on to the next paragraph if you’re sensitive to that sort of thing): “Emma was mostly happy and she didn’t feel that someone else was in control of her now. She no longer believed that she had been possessed….She had been stressed and who wouldn’t have been under the circumstances?”

The foreshadowing is not shaded so much as it is blocked in with the narrative equivalent of bolding and all-caps, and I’m slightly offended that the author thought it necessary to repeatedly, and I mean repeatedly (REPEATEDLY. REPEATEDLY. Get it? Are you sure? Because I have plenty of text colours and font options at my disposal here) highlight the behavioural distinction between the twins in order to set up an ambiguity of identity. Had I marked every occasion that Matilde’s nail biting and Sophie’s self-assuredness was mentioned my copy would have been more bristly than value pack of toothbrushes.

The hamfistedness of the writing infects the characterisation, too, and there’s a sense of these characters being little more than chunks of ectoplasm drifting around on the bookish version of the Hollywood blue screen. Because of the utter lack of depth given to Emma or any of those around her, it’s impossible to respond to her bizarre actions with anything more than a bewildered “what?” (thus I exclaimed many times while reading this book.) It’s not that there’s a narrative ambiguity at play here, it’s that this book makes absolutely no sense on any level unless one is to assume that the entirety of the narration exists in Emma’s head and this is all a retelling of Robert Cormier’s I am the Cheese or something by Philip K Dick. Unfortunately I am quite certain that this is not the case.

Since it’s still January, it’s not too late to add another New Year’s resolution to my current one of never reading comments on the internet. And that’s to never, ever read a book that’s compared with a current blockbuster film unless it’s for schadenfreudian purposes.

Rating: star Review: Possessed by Niki Valentineblankstar Review: Possessed by Niki Valentineblankstar Review: Possessed by Niki Valentineblankstar Review: Possessed by Niki Valentineblankstar Review: Possessed by Niki Valentine

With thanks to Hachette Australia for the review copy

Support Read in a Single Sitting by purchasing Possessed using one of the affiliate links below:

Amazon | Book Depository UK | Book Depository USA | Booktopia

The Haunted by Niki Valentine Review: Possessed by Niki Valentine

5 comments

  1. I’m always a little wary of those ‘if you liked’ comparisons. They too often seem to reduce stories to their simplest elements without any reference to style or rythym or theme or any number of other things that might have been what I liked most about the book. I don’t need my books dumbed down for me! And, based on this review, it seems my caution is justified!

    • Stephanie /

      I completely agree, Imelda. Particularly when the point of the comparison is so nebulous. I think here it was meant to be to do with the whole “is she going mad, or not?” theme, and perhaps the artsy setting.

      Usually I wouldn’t post such a negative review, but this one had such an interesting concept that I really wanted to love it, and did read through to the end. It was just so frustrating watching it fall apart instead.

  2. It’s one thing to make the “if you like this then you’ll like that” comparisons (I do enjoy them every now and again), so long as you back it up with WHY you think that way. I think the real problem resides in that most people don’t provide any foreseeable justifications or merits to their reasoning. They just say so because, to them, that’s the way it is.

    For me, the complexities of a storyline/movie are far more interesting than the dumbed down version of it and if you tell me that another said story/movie shares those same complexities, then I’ll be more willing to check out your recommendation. It all boils down to too many opinions and not enough fact.

    In regard to this book based on your review, I really don’t think it’s for me. It sounds as though the author is using a cheap trick to try and make a big impact and failed in the execution. Honestly, I don’t know how you made it through all the jumbled text because that would drive me utterly mad!

  3. I’m with Nikki, I don’t know how you finished the book either! The examples you provided from the text were quite difficult to read- so choppy and unnatural. You provided a fair review though, Stephanie.

    • Stephanie /

      I think I was reading out of some horrible masochistic urge!

      Often it’s just that a book isn’t to my taste, but I know that it’ll appeal to other readers. This one…I’m still shaking my head in disbelief!

Comments make us happy! Do say hello!

Follow us on Blog Lovin' Follow on Bloglovin

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers