Book reviews, new books, publishing news, book giveaways, and author interviews

Being God and Playing Frankenstein in Grant and Applegate’s Eve & Adam

 Being God and Playing Frankenstein in Grant and Applegates Eve & Adam

“It’s the fate of all creators: they fall in love with their creations.”

The maker-creation binary is at the heart of Eve & Adam, the latest release from YA authors Michael Grant and Katherine Applegate. However, it’s not as simple as this snappy sentence above might suggest.

The fact that these words are spoken by Terra Spiker, a woman who treats her daughter Eve with about as much care and affection as Dr Frankenstein did his monster, and who simultaneously merrily presides over a company whose secret project involves vat-grown humans, is testament to that.

Grant and Applegate are known for exploring often challenging themes and questions within what might be taken superficially as slight, action-oriented novels for young adults, and Eve and Adam is no different. It’s not a subtle novel, but then, neither was Frankenstein and, hey, neither was Genesis. There’s plenty of slick science, plenty of action, and plenty of fast-talking teen banter, sure. But in addition to all of this there’s a thorough exploration of what it means to fill the various maker roles, what it means to be a creation, and the conflicts that spring up between the two.

We meet Eve (an abbreviation of Evening, a name that which offers a notable contrast to the meanings we take from Eve) as she hurtles through the air after a terrible accident. Although her injuries are severe, including the loss of a leg, she’s taken to her billionaire mother’s headquarters, where with the help of teen employee Solo, she quickly recuperates. Far too quickly, actually. Eve has her suspicions that something’s not quite right about the whole thing, as does Solo, whom we learn has been adopted by Terra Spiker after being orphaned. Solo is on a mission to bring down Spiker Biopharmaceuticals, and it’s a mission he becomes even more passionate about when he learns that Eve has been given a holiday project involving creating a perfectly lifelike simulation of a human. Because with Spiker’s hazy ethical track record, there’s every likelihood that this simulation’s going to be a little too real for comfort.

The plot unfolds fairly much as you expect it will, and to be honest I was a little disappointed by the book’s narrative bluntness. The various character reveals worked well enough (no one is who they seem), although there were several elements that just didn’t quite sit right with me. The reasoning behind Solo’s involvement at Spiker Biopharm felt a little hazy, and I couldn’t quite suspend disbelief during the action scenes that took place outside the Spiker headquarters. I found the subplot involving Eve’s creation quite weak as well: it didn’t seem to build with any real rhythm, and simply felt as though it ebbed away at the end. This is, as far as I know, the first in a series, but even so I didn’t quite feel that the resolution quite worked.

Perhaps my biggest bugbear with the whole book was the use of sexually overt misogyny to belittle the female teen characters. This was baffling to me, particularly given that the women in this book are otherwise empowered. I simply can’t imagine a women of Terra Spiker’s status letting loose with a constant barrage of “sluts” and “whores” when talking about her daughter’s friend. “You have one friend and she’s a drunken slut,” she sneers at one point; this language is repeated over and over. Gratuitous misogyny is also an issue during the book’s climax, where our Evil Scientist character gloatingly says to Solo: “You haven’t tapped that little piece yet?” Why is it that antagonists are so often rendered as being sexually deviant, and why, in such a gratuitous manner? Honestly, if you’re going about kidnapping people and generally being awful, I will quite readily conclude that you’re not a nice person without being slugged with an additional cheap misogynistic blow.

These issues aside, however, I did enjoy the exploration of the different maker-creator notions–the creator, the birth mother, and the adoptive mother–and the fact that almost all of the major characters filled at least two of these. When stitched together, a fascinating web of maker-creator connections arises, and the tension around each of these is so palpable that you can almost hear it humming. Of the main characters, it’s Terra and Eve who experience the most different connections, and perhaps it’s this that also leads to their ever more conflicted relationship. When Eve effectively adopts her friend Aislin, for example, it’s a relationship that resonates both through Eve and through Terra as well. She also adds additional depth to her relationship between herself and her “Adam” by giving him a name–something that Frankenstein fails to do to his own monster.

Eve’s conflict over creating Adam is also fascinating, particularly as she’s playing the God role while Aislin, playing that of the devil, hovers over her shoulder urging her to ignore her natural desire for balance and to embrace what’s effectively a sort of creative hedonism. “Everyone should have flaws,” thinks Eve. “Isn’t that what makes us interesting?” Aislin, on the other hand, thinks that it’s inevitable that Eve should seek out perfection in her creation, after all, she does as much when she’s contemplating guys to date. As she continues her work, Eve begins to appreciate the challenge of creation:

“I could make him reckless and bold. He might die younger. He might be a criminal. He might be a great creative mind. This is not the simple, fun artwork of making a face and a body…this isn’t as simple as it looks.”

Interestingly, her creation is done beneath the shadow of Terra, who’s almost frighteningly goddess-like (and I do love that the creators in this book, as alluded to by the book’s title, are female). Whatever creative affordances Eve has in her little lab, they’re nothing compared with those of Terra. Her name’s evocative enough, but the fact that she’s a billionaire who has no concept of money works as a parallel to some sort of supreme being with infinite resources at their fingertips. However, as we did in Frankenstein we learn that there are vast differences between the different types of creation, and the relationships that arise between the different types of creator-maker binaries. Is it possible to love something that has been constructed? Or to be truly loved by something you’ve created naturally?

When you reach the last page of Eve & Adam, it’s hard not to flick back to the first page and re-read Eve’s thoughts on dying:

“When you die…you should be thinking about love…you should not be thinking about an apple.”

 Rating: star Being God and Playing Frankenstein in Grant and Applegates Eve & Adamstar Being God and Playing Frankenstein in Grant and Applegates Eve & Adamstar Being God and Playing Frankenstein in Grant and Applegates Eve & Adamblankstar Being God and Playing Frankenstein in Grant and Applegates Eve & Adamblankstar Being God and Playing Frankenstein in Grant and Applegates Eve & Adam (good)

With thanks to Hardie Grant Australia for the review copy

Support Read in a Single Sitting by purchasing Eve & Adam from

Amazon | Book Depository UK | Book Depository USA | Booktopia | The Nile 

See our other Michael Grant reviews and features

8 comments

  1. Thanks for the interesting review. According to Amazon, this is YA (I wasn’t sure) which I don’t often read. But the ideas in the book sound great so I may try it.

    • Stephanie /

      I’m always pleasantly surprised by how much Grant (I’m not as familiar with Applegate) manages to pack into his books. They might seem fairly slight given all the action, but there’s often a lot going on beneath the surface. He stopped by here once and said that he’s often guilty of “committing philosophy”. It’s not especially overt, though. Readers just looking for a quick read will get that; but the ones who dig for something a little deeper will get that as well.

      If you haven’t tried his Gone series, and to a lesser extent his new BZRK series, I recommend those as well. :)

      • Ah, of course! I hadn’t made the link! This is the author from the Gone series! I read three of those books and enjoyed them a lot.

        That changes everything and I will put this on my wishlist. :-)

        • Stephanie /

          I love that series, too! :) I hope you enjoy this one!

  2. I’ve had this marked as to be read for a long time but I’ve been reading mixed reviews from other readers. It sounds good and the idea is definitely interesting but sadly I’m not expecting greatness with this one. Your review does give some great positives for the novel though, I like the comparisons you had with Frankenstein and I love Michael Grant’s Gone series so I’ll give this a chance :)

    • Stephanie /

      I’m a huge fan of Grant’s Gone series as well, and quite enjoyed his new BZRK series, too. :) This one feels a little younger than both of those series, and almost has a comic book novel feel to it in a way. If you like Grant’s work, I’d recommend giving it a try.

  3. This sounds interesting, though the misogyny seems a bit ooky.

    • Stephanie /

      It’s definitely an interesting book, but I was surprised by those elements. To be fair, the authors are obviously critical of it, which is important (so often this sort of stuff goes utterly unchallenged), but I found having these characters resorting to misogynistic attacks as a way of making them “bad” or “intimidating” was disappointing, and in the case of Eve’s mum, really out of character.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers