Update: those looking for the missing final chapter of this book can find it here.
Like most small communities, the village of Daggorhorn is not without its secrets. An impoverished community in the heart of the woods, it is one that has seen more than its fair share of loss, and an undercurrent of fear pervades its every aspect–particularly when the sun sets and the full moon rises. Daggorhorn is at the mercy of the Wolf, a fearsome half-human, half-wolf beast kept at bay only by the village’s long-time habit of providing sacrifices and staying as far as possible out of its way.
But this full moon, things are different. A blood moon hangs above the forest, and the villagers know that despite their best efforts, the outcome will be nothing less than horrific. As the small, close-knit community becomes victim to the brutality of the wolf, tensions rise, and so do suspicions–and finger-pointing and condemnation abound. Valerie, whose sister is one of the victims, finds herself at the centre of the villagers’ accusations about the true identity of the wolf. But Valerie has her own suspicions about the wolf’s identity…
My thoughts
A hotly anticipated 2011 release, Red Riding Hood has been written to tie in with the film of the same name, and unfortunately it shows. Adapted from the film’s script, it’s the barest bones of a story–and by bare, I mean thoroughly picked clean of any last morsel of meat. It runs at just over three hundred pages, but the length is misleading, given that over sixty of these are taken up by chapter headings, and that the final chapter will be belatedly released online to coincide with the film’s release. Yes, you did read that correctly–the final chapter (admittedly touted as a “bonus” chapter, but really rather essential to the reading experience given the extreme ambiguity of the novel thus far) has been embargoed until mid March, a fact that has raised the ire of readers who have shelled out the big bucks for what is effectively an extended theatrical trailer. And rightfully so, because it is a marketing gimmick that does leave rather a bad taste in one’s mouth.
The utter lack of an ending, however, is only one of Red Riding Hood’s myriad problems. The book is plagued by all manner of narrative and stylistic issues to the point that it would give me RSI were I to painstakingly sit down and document them all. It’s a shame, because fractured fairytales and retellings of famous cautionary works can make for rather interesting authorial fodder, and from afar this one seems to tick all of the requisite boxes. But after even a few pages one can see that the book is listless, slapdash, and uneven. The village setting should intrigue, but is so reminiscent of M Night Shyamalan’s The Village that it feels derivative–and painfully so. But where The Village manages to inure its creepy little setting with moral ambiguity and paranoia, Red Riding Hood suffers from a distinct lack of atmosphere. There’s a sense of poverty, isolation, and alienation, but it’s never explored: rather, we’re given a few jolting anecdotes and a mass of blow-by-blow character descriptions that never slip deeper than the superficial, and the setting as a result feels like a Potemkin village rather than anything that might truly exist.
The plot, too, is slim, and its various turning points difficult to fathom. We’re led to believe that the villagers live in fear of an awesomely powerful and horrifically slavering wolf, but yet there has been no effort made to prepare a vaguely functional contingency plan in case things go wrong. The fact, too, that the village seems to run by the lunar calendar, and harvests accordingly, yet is utterly unaware of the possibility of a harvest moon seems, well, slightly problematic. Furthermore, the fact that it takes perhaps half of the book to lead up to this point is an issue, particularly given the leisurely pace of the book beforehand, and the subsequent hasty scramble of the narrative afterwards. The villagers run amok, accusing various individuals of lycanthropy in a manner that feels unmotivated and unplotted, and the way the narrative reaches its climax feels truly messy. Our protagonist is accused by one of her friends of being a werewolf, but mere moments later is exonerated by the same girl in a sudden change of heart that follows no rhyme or reason. Similarly, the author alludes to several characters as possibly being the werewolf, but does so by throwing in so many red herrings that the book as a result smells revoltingly fishy. If this were a better novel, I’d say that this is ostensibly to highlight the sort of inherent paranoia that comes of inward-looking societies subjected to an external threat. But given the overall quality of this book, I’m rather more inclined to say that there’s a distinct unfamiliarity with both the mystery and horror genres going on here.
I wish I could say that the prose and characterisation were the standouts here, as I’m notoriously lenient on plot provided that these two things are done well. Unfortunately, this isn’t the case. The prose is bizarrely uneven, aiming for a lyrical quality in some parts to the degree that one could play a game of bingo with all of the similes and metaphors on offer, but then falling back. on. staccato. sentences. in others. The use of an omniscient point of view makes for problematic reading, as well–omniscient is a notoriously challenging viewpoint to write well, and I think that the choice to use it here is largely due to the fact that this book is truly at its heart a script rather than a novel. It’s fine to flash between characters in a movie, but in a novel it can be a cheap device if done poorly–particularly if it’s used to obscure information from the reader. Worse, the prose is peppered with painful explication, with the scenes with the bad guy priest perhaps the most evident exemplars of these. Readers are perfectly able to make their own judgements about characters’ motivations and to read at a level beyond the literal without being told what’s going on, and to explain to reader such things as the fact that the villagers have become animals themselves in their determination to cast blame, or that they have allowed both a literal and spiritual evil into their home is just a touch patronising.
Perhaps the weakest element of this book, and thus the major cause of its downfall, is its characterisation. While we’re given more than enough in terms of physical descriptions, we’re never truly let inside the various characters’ heads, and in those few cases that we are, the characters suddenly insist on acting entirely out of character, thus invalidating our readings anyway. Why does independent, tomboyish Valerie suddenly fall for cruel and bitter Peter at first sight (and after a grand total of one line of dialogue, or monologue to be exact])? How are we supposed to believe that Lucie is in love with Henry when he scarcely even appears at all? Why does Valerie’s friend suddenly do an about face after accusing her friend (with reasonably good reason) of being in cahoots with the wolf? And must the literary folk of the world endure yet another evil priest character? Truly, the only character with whom I felt some sort of vague empathy was Valerie’s mother, but her role is unfortunately vanishingly small.
Conclusions
While Red Riding Hood has been much hyped in both the blogosphere and in the cinemas, it’s unfortunately not a book that I can recommend. While it draws on the strong foundations of the classic fairytale, the elements where it succeeds in doing so are few indeed. In addition to the weak plot, the book suffers from poor characterisation and awkward writing, and the cheap gimmick regarding the final chapter will no doubt raise some eyebrows–if you must, buy the updated edition further down the track.
Rating: 



(serious flaws)
With thanks to Hachette Australia for the review copy
Purchase Red Riding Hood from Amazon | Book Depository UK | Book Depository USA












I was intrigued when I first read the synopsis, but this was clearly not a good read. I’m constantly made aware of how much work and thought goes into writing a good novel and this effort has brought that home again. I have a problem with books turned into movies – the other way round is a lot more problematic at the best of times. Do you plan to watch the movie?
stargazerpuj recently posted..Book Review- Seven Years by Peter Stamm
I was disappointed, too, because it’s a great concept, and so much could have been done with it. But the execution is surprisingly poor, so it was a let down to say the least.
I’ll see the film if I get free tickets
Great review Stephanie. I used to read book adaptations of films but I stay clear of them now. The movie itself however looks great.
Man of la Book recently posted..Book Review- Suddenly in the Depths of the Forest by Amos Oz
The trailer makes it look pretty striking, and given that the script existed before the book it might be a whole lot stronger. The novel definitely has a film-on-the-page feel.
I always loved the story growing up, and I’ve actually read an amazing dark version of Red Riding Hood. Unfortunately, this wasn’t it. This one was terrible, and I should have realised that when I saw who was directing the movie. Catherine Hardwicke is the woman who killed the Twilight Series for me, you think this would have warned me off anything else she has had a hand in. I must be a sucker for punishment.
As it was, the first few pages of the book annoyed me so much I put it down and only picked it up a week later because I was desperate. Transparent and thin, I can’t describe how disappointing and juvenile it feels to me, like a 12 year picked up a pen and tried to write a novel, although in most cases, a 12 year old would have a better imagination with the ability to flesh out the characters and settings alot better than in this case. I thought this person had a degree in creative writing? Finding that EXTREMELY hard to believe.
I want my money back. They owe it to me just for the stupid marketing ploy, wasting my time with this drivel will cost them extra. Definitely not going to see the movie
Thanks for the comment, Moana. I feel your frustration, and can definitely say that similar sentiments have been echoed around the bookosphere. It’s a weak novel at best, and it’s certainly not helped by this weird marketing approach! I can see a few public apologies being made down the track…
Dear Moana, first of all you cant blame Catherine Hardwick for killing the twilight series because it was already dead in the first place! The books were terribly written, unevenly paced and excruciantingly painful to read and Stephenie Meyer is to blame for the rotten material she provided to Hardwicke. With that out of the way, I agree this book was bad but so much better than twilight!
Thanks for your comment, Brandon. I haven’t seen the Twilight films, so I can’t really comment, but I did struggle through the first book (needless to say, I haven’t read the others). Given that Red Riding Hood was first written as a film I’m interested to see how it holds up on the big screen.
When I purchased the book, I wasn’t aware of the lack of ending. I wasn’t aware of the cheap marketing ploy. I won’t be going to see the movie nor will I be encouraging anyone to read the book. My copy is in the trash.
You’re spot on. This book made me so angry! I nearly threw it across the room when I was done, I was so mad.
Belle recently posted..Random fun- Game for history-Dickens nerds
I was flabbergasted, particularly since the lack of an ending wasn’t highlighted anywhere on the book. Judging from the comments on this post, we’re not the only ones who were unimpressed by this marketing ploy!
I know what you mean, I kept on flipping through the pages, thinking, did I miss something?!
Yes, I’m more surprised when I read reviews and comments from people who actually enjoyed the book! The more I think about it the angrier I get, hehe.
Belle recently posted..Random fun- Game for history-Dickens nerds
I can definitely see this book not being for everyone. I went into it skeptical and ended up loving it. I liked the lyrical way it was written. I felt a connection to Peter. BUT, i can see how others would get annoyed with the writing and Peter.
I think the end of the book not actually being in the book is ridiculous though. So stupid. It leaves us feeling like there is no ending! Who doesn’t include the last chapter in the actual book?? It is so hard to overlook this aspect.
Even if i disagree with you, I still enjoyed your review.
Jennifer
http://littleshelf.blogspot.com/
Jennifer A recently posted..Review- Glimmerglass
Thanks for visiting Jennifer. I found the writing up and down–there were some very fine, lyrical moments, as you say, but I felt that there was an unevenness to the prose at times.
Agreed on the last chapter. It goes beyond ambiguous and falls into “unfinished”! I’ve had a few grumpy comments about this ending, and there’s a fair bit of chatter about it on the bookosphere, too.
I’m curious to see the film of this, though, as the novel has a very cinematic feel to it.
Yeah, I definitely want to see the movie as well. I agree that the novel had a cinematic feel to it- it was like I could see exactly how it would be filmed when i read it.
I have to admit, I’m not a writer and don’t know much about prose. Maybe that’s why it didn’t bother me? I don’t know. I think this might just be one of those love it or hate it type books (like Twilight).
I did email the publisher to tell them of my disappointment though. I want that last chapter that’s online in my book! Not on the web. We’ll see if they get back to me.
Thanks for replying respectably! I was afraid to say I liked it after all of the negative reviews. LOL
Jennifer
Jennifer A recently posted..Review- Glimmerglass
It’s probably just a case of different tastes.
I firmly believe that you don’t need to be a writer to have an opinion on a book, and that all opinions are just as valid when it comes to whether or not you liked something!
As my Mum says, “if we all had the same taste, we’d all have married Jean Dixon”
A thorough, thought provoking review, Stephanie. Would you say the novel was written by an amateur? Do you think better editing may have improved it? It sounds like an example of how not to write. I’ll follow your link to the last chapter.
Hi Wendy,
Thanks for your lovely comment. It really does have an amateur feel to it–as you’ll probably see when you read that last chapter. I’m not sure whether it’s due to the fact that it’s based on a film script, or whether the wrong author was chosen for it. I think a bit of heavy handed editing could probably have helped, but I think it would still suffer from being “slight”.
I wonder if they just based this entirely on a script. Books inspired by scripts are usually pretty lacking. And leaving out the last chapter? Uncool. Glad I held back on my impulse to buy it.
That’s exactly how it reads–it almost seems as though someone went through and simply culled all the stage directions!
Personally, I loved the book and the way it was written. I thought it was interesting and intentional that Sarah Blakley-Cartwright kept switching from the thoughts and actions of each character. This left the reader with some insight of the villagers thoughts while still leaving a taste of question in each character’s true nature. I think she did a wonderful job of keeping the reader guessing and forced the reader to think like the characters they were following. The way it was written was probably what I liked most, though that is all personal preference. I agree that reading the last chapter online was somewhat frustrating though.
Hi Devan,
I’m really glad to hear that you liked it, and that the POV switching worked well for you. For me it had a sense of the cinematic, and felt as though it was trying to replicate the feel of a modern-day thriller, which is perhaps it didn’t work for me. The book’s selling well, so no doubt plenty of other people are enjoying it, too.
I had no idea this book was based on the script but now that I think about it, it does kind of show.
I have mixed views on this book. At the beginning, I thought it was bit slow but I carried on because I wanted to know how the tom-boy version of red riding hood would deal with the whole wolf and two guys situation. I liked the whole betroved to one but lusting over another but it did get confussing when she started feeling something for Henry because within a sentence, she changed her mind again … but I overlooked that and carried on.
The wolf part when it finally kicked in, I will admit, had me hooked. Some of the suspects were a bit iffy and quickly suspected then not suspected but I thought this was just a way of showing how parnoria can affect people. The real question for me was is it Henry or is it Peter. It had to be one of them, right? That was how the book (before or the random suspects) was leading me. It wasn’t til near the end that thought, hang on, may not be the boys afterall. I thought the ending would tell me ….
oh wait, its not there. Just her undying love whether he’s the wolf or not … I will admit, I got a bit angery. When they said is this end for red riding hood, I genrally thought it was because of a second book not because the ending was on the net!
So overall … the book’s Okay … sorry for the long rant XD
Thanks for your thoughtful response, Gemma! I think it was a book with definite potential, but the writing style and abruptness of the narrative turned me off it a little. You’re not alone in being frustrated about the ending! I’ve read so many cliffhanger YAs recently that I’m thinking about updating my guidelines to say “no cliffhanger books, please!”
I really enjoyed the movie. My whole family did, in fact. I’m not sure if I will read the novel or not, but the movie was great, in my opinion.
I liked the mystery feeling over who was the Wolf. Every time I thought I knew, something else would happen and my mind was changed. I really had no clue at the end that the Wolf was….I won’t spoil anything by saying who. But anyways, it just surprised me.
I also loved the romance and kind of love triangle between her true love and the guy she was supposed to marry.
In the movie, I liked the way the ending was portrayed. Yes, it was a cliffhanger. But it also left it open for many options. For there to be a second movie.
Hi Katra,
Thanks for stopping by! I’m glad to hear that you enjoyed the film. The book has a very cinematic feel to it, and I think is written more for the screen than for a reading audience. I think the point of view changes and the way the suspense is worked in would translate very well to the screen, and I’m glad to hear that this is the case. I’m curious about how the cliffhanger works in the film, now, and might need to check it out myself!
When it comes to my reading, I’m not one who likes to read scripts for plays or movie screen plays. I like novels with lots of detail that I can literally taste, but not too much detail like Stephenie Meyer puts into her novels. She leaves nothing for the imagination. Anywho! Got off track.
I don’t know. Everyone is different and some people like movies that others don’t. I liked the village feeling to it and how it took a nice spin off the story I was told as a child. The romance was cute and believable. A bit passionate and steamy a few times with Valerie and Peter.
I don’t know how it ended in the book, but in the movie (SPOILER, don’t read if you don’t want to know how the movie ends, although it might be the same as in the book) she goes to her grandmother’s house and finds her father there. Her grandmother is dead. Her father is the Wolf and wants to pass the curse down to her. She had stabbed Peter in the woods five seconds earlier because she thought he was the Wolf. He walks in and stabs her father with silver and Valerie stabs her father in the chest with the hand from the Wolf Hunter (his fingernails are silver). Then, her and Peter have to hide her father’s body in the lake because the villagers will hang her if they find out that she’s the daughter of the Wolf. Peter was bitten by the Wolf and he’ll obviously turn into the Wolf later, so he decides he’s going to leave until he can control the Wolf in him or something. Valerie said she’d wait for Peter when he said he was leaving. So, she returns to the village alone. Everyone thinks the Wolf is still there, but the real Wolf is dead. Everyone thinks the Wolf killed her grandmother and that her father is just missing. No one knows what really happened except Valerie and Peter. At the very end, Valerie is walking in the village when she hears this growl. In the forest, she sees a black wolf walk out of the shadows of the trees. She moves a step and smiles. And the movie ends. It’s obviously Peter.
I’m watching the movie now as I write this. Lol. I love it!